1962 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2013 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2013 Honda CR-V is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 609 kg more than 2013 Honda CR-V.
Because 1962 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Honda CR-V, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac Sixty (582 Nm) has 361 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Honda CR-V. (221 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac Sixty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Honda CR-V.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac Sixty | 2013 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Cadillac | Honda |
Model | Sixty | CR-V |
Year Released | 1962 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 2354 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 182 HP |
Torque | 582 Nm | 221 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 99 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2135 kg | 1526 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1644 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 58 L |