1962 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport
To start off, 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport weights approximately 354 kg more than 1962 Cadillac Sixty.
Because 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac Sixty (582 Nm) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport. (508 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac Sixty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Cadillac Sixty | 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport | |
Make | Cadillac | Land Rover |
Model | Sixty | Range Rover Sport |
Year Released | 1962 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 2013 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | electric |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 370 HP |
Torque | 582 Nm | 508 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 93 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2135 kg | 2489 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1784 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2745 mm |