1962 Chrysler New Yorker vs. 2005 Lotus Exige

To start off, 2005 Lotus Exige is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Chrysler New Yorker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Chrysler New Yorker would be higher.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1962 Chrysler New Yorker has automatic transmission and 2005 Lotus Exige has manual transmission. 2005 Lotus Exige will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1962 Chrysler New Yorker will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1962 Chrysler New Yorker 2005 Lotus Exige
Make Chrysler Lotus
Model New Yorker Exige
Year Released 1962 2005
Engine Position Front Middle
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 0 HP 240 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Vehicle Length 5620 mm 3800 mm
Vehicle Width 2020 mm 1730 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1160 mm
Wheelbase Size 3210 mm 2310 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]