1962 Chrysler New Yorker vs. 2006 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2006 Toyota Matrix is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Chrysler New Yorker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Chrysler New Yorker would be higher.
Because 2006 Toyota Matrix is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Chrysler New Yorker. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Matrix will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Chrysler New Yorker | 2006 Toyota Matrix | |
| Make | Chrysler | Toyota |
| Model | New Yorker | Matrix |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 118 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5620 mm | 4360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1570 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2610 mm |
