1962 Chrysler New Yorker vs. 2009 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2009 Ford Ecosport is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Chrysler New Yorker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Chrysler New Yorker would be higher.
Because 1962 Chrysler New Yorker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Chrysler New Yorker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1962 Chrysler New Yorker has automatic transmission and 2009 Ford Ecosport has manual transmission. 2009 Ford Ecosport will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1962 Chrysler New Yorker will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Chrysler New Yorker | 2009 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | New Yorker | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 67 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5620 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2490 mm |
