1962 Citroen 2CV vs. 1963 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 1963 Lincoln Continental is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 7,048 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Lincoln Continental (284 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 274 more horse power than 1962 Citroen 2CV. (10 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 1962 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 1905 kg more than 1962 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Lincoln Continental is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Lincoln Continental. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Citroen 2CV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Citroen 2CV | 1963 Lincoln Continental | |
Make | Citroen | Lincoln |
Model | 2CV | Continental |
Year Released | 1962 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 375 cc | 7048 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 10 HP | 284 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 495 kg | 2400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 5500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2000 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 3210 mm |