1962 Citroen 2CV vs. 1964 MG 1100
To start off, 1964 MG 1100 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 1,098 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 MG 1100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 MG 1100 (53 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1962 Citroen 2CV. (10 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 MG 1100 should accelerate faster than 1962 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 MG 1100 weights approximately 330 kg more than 1962 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 MG 1100 (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Citroen 2CV. (22 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1964 MG 1100 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Citroen 2CV.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Citroen 2CV | 1964 MG 1100 | |
Make | Citroen | MG |
Model | 2CV | 1100 |
Year Released | 1962 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 375 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 10 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 22 Nm | 83 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 495 kg | 825 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2380 mm |