1962 Citroen 2CV vs. 1969 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 1969 Zastava 850 K is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 846 cc, 1969 Zastava 850 K is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Zastava 850 K (35 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1962 Citroen 2CV. (10 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Zastava 850 K should accelerate faster than 1962 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Zastava 850 K weights approximately 360 kg more than 1962 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Zastava 850 K is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Zastava 850 K. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Citroen 2CV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Citroen 2CV | 1969 Zastava 850 K | |
| Make | Citroen | Zastava |
| Model | 2CV | 850 K |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1969 |
| Engine Size | 375 cc | 846 cc |
| Horse Power | 10 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 495 kg | 855 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2010 mm |
