1962 Citroen Ami vs. 1968 Mini MK II
To start off, 1968 Mini MK II is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 848 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Mini MK II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Mini MK II (34 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1962 Citroen Ami. (22 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Mini MK II should accelerate faster than 1962 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Citroen Ami weights approximately 10 kg more than 1968 Mini MK II.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Mini MK II (61 Nm) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Citroen Ami. (42 Nm). This means 1968 Mini MK II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Citroen Ami.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Citroen Ami | 1968 Mini MK II | |
| Make | Citroen | Mini |
| Model | Ami | MK II |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 602 cc | 848 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 22 HP | 34 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 42 Nm | 61 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 610 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 3060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1420 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2040 mm |
