1962 Citroen Ami vs. 1983 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 1983 Nissan Pulsar is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 1,486 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Nissan Pulsar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Nissan Pulsar (70 HP) has 48 more horse power than 1962 Citroen Ami. (22 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Nissan Pulsar should accelerate faster than 1962 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Nissan Pulsar weights approximately 260 kg more than 1962 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Nissan Pulsar (115 Nm) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Citroen Ami. (42 Nm). This means 1983 Nissan Pulsar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Citroen Ami.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Citroen Ami | 1983 Nissan Pulsar | |
Make | Citroen | Nissan |
Model | Ami | Pulsar |
Year Released | 1962 | 1983 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 1486 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 22 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 42 Nm | 115 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2420 mm |