1962 Citroen Ami vs. 1989 Matra-Simca M25
To start off, 1989 Matra-Simca M25 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 1,764 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Matra-Simca M25 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1989 Matra-Simca M25 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Matra-Simca M25. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Citroen Ami, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Matra-Simca M25 (363 Nm) has 321 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Citroen Ami. (42 Nm). This means 1989 Matra-Simca M25 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Citroen Ami.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Citroen Ami | 1989 Matra-Simca M25 | |
Make | Citroen | Matra-Simca |
Model | Ami | M25 |
Year Released | 1962 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 1764 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 22 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 42 Nm | 363 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |