1962 Citroen Ami vs. 1999 Dodge Durango
To start off, 1999 Dodge Durango is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Citroen Ami would be higher. In terms of performance, 1999 Dodge Durango (360 HP) has 338 more horse power than 1962 Citroen Ami. (22 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Dodge Durango should accelerate faster than 1962 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Dodge Durango weights approximately 437 kg more than 1962 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1999 Dodge Durango is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Citroen Ami. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Dodge Durango will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Dodge Durango (559 Nm) has 517 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Citroen Ami. (42 Nm). This means 1999 Dodge Durango will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Citroen Ami.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Citroen Ami | 1999 Dodge Durango | |
| Make | Citroen | Dodge |
| Model | Ami | Durango |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1999 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | V |
| Horse Power | 22 HP | 360 HP |
| Torque | 42 Nm | 559 Nm |
| Top Speed | 113 km/hour | 228 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1057 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2950 mm |
