1962 Citroen Ami vs. 2000 Seat Arosa
To start off, 2000 Seat Arosa is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 1,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Seat Arosa is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Seat Arosa (123 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1962 Citroen Ami. (22 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Seat Arosa should accelerate faster than 1962 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Seat Arosa weights approximately 669 kg more than 1962 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Seat Arosa (117 Nm) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Citroen Ami. (42 Nm). This means 2000 Seat Arosa will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Citroen Ami.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Citroen Ami | 2000 Seat Arosa | |
| Make | Citroen | Seat |
| Model | Ami | Arosa |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 602 cc | 1359 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 22 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 42 Nm | 117 Nm |
| Top Speed | 113 km/hour | 157 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1289 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2850 mm |
