1962 Citroen Ami vs. 2003 Renault Megane
To start off, 2003 Renault Megane is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Renault Megane (114 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1962 Citroen Ami. (22 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1962 Citroen Ami.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Renault Megane (152 Nm) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Citroen Ami. (42 Nm). This means 2003 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Citroen Ami.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Citroen Ami | 2003 Renault Megane | |
Make | Citroen | Renault |
Model | Ami | Megane |
Year Released | 1962 | 2003 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 22 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 42 Nm | 152 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 74 mm | 79.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 70 mm | 80.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 60 L |