1962 Citroen Ami vs. 2004 Mazda MX
To start off, 2004 Mazda MX is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda MX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda MX (160 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 138 more horse power than 1962 Citroen Ami. (22 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda MX should accelerate faster than 1962 Citroen Ami.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda MX (207 Nm) has 165 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Citroen Ami. (42 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda MX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Citroen Ami.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Citroen Ami | 2004 Mazda MX | |
| Make | Citroen | Mazda |
| Model | Ami | MX |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 602 cc | 2261 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 22 HP | 160 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 42 Nm | 207 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 74 mm | 87.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 70 mm | 94 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2760 mm |
