1962 Citroen Ami vs. 2008 Volvo S80
To start off, 2008 Volvo S80 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 2,922 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Volvo S80 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Volvo S80 weights approximately 1059 kg more than 1962 Citroen Ami.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Volvo S80 (380 Nm) has 338 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Citroen Ami. (42 Nm). This means 2008 Volvo S80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Citroen Ami.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Citroen Ami | 2008 Volvo S80 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | Ami | S80 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2008 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 2922 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 22 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 42 Nm | 380 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 113 km/hour | 245 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1679 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 11.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 80 L |