1962 Citroen DS vs. 1970 Volvo 140
To start off, 1970 Volvo 140 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Citroen DS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Citroen DS would be higher. At 1,986 cc (4 cylinders), 1970 Volvo 140 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Citroen DS (82 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1970 Volvo 140. (81 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Citroen DS should accelerate faster than 1970 Volvo 140. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Citroen DS weights approximately 54 kg more than 1970 Volvo 140. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1970 Volvo 140 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Volvo 140. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Citroen DS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Citroen DS | 1970 Volvo 140 | |
| Make | Citroen | Volvo |
| Model | DS | 140 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1970 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1911 cc | 1986 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 82 HP | 81 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1266 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 4650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2610 mm |
