1962 Citroen DS vs. 2001 Ford Econovan
To start off, 2001 Ford Econovan is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Citroen DS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Citroen DS would be higher. At 1,911 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Citroen DS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford Econovan (90 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1962 Citroen DS. (82 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford Econovan should accelerate faster than 1962 Citroen DS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Econovan weights approximately 15 kg more than 1962 Citroen DS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2001 Ford Econovan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Ford Econovan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Citroen DS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Citroen DS | 2001 Ford Econovan | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | DS | Econovan |
Year Released | 1962 | 2001 |
Body Type | Convertible | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1911 cc | 1789 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 82 HP | 90 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1295 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2210 mm |