1962 Citroen DS vs. 2001 Jaguar XJ220
To start off, 2001 Jaguar XJ220 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Citroen DS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Citroen DS would be higher. At 3,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Jaguar XJ220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Jaguar XJ220 (390 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 308 more horse power than 1962 Citroen DS. (82 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Jaguar XJ220 should accelerate faster than 1962 Citroen DS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Jaguar XJ220 weights approximately 390 kg more than 1962 Citroen DS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2001 Jaguar XJ220 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Jaguar XJ220. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Citroen DS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Citroen DS | 2001 Jaguar XJ220 | |
| Make | Citroen | Jaguar |
| Model | DS | XJ220 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1911 cc | 3492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 82 HP | 390 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1710 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 4940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 2230 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1160 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2720 mm |
