1962 Citroen DS vs. 2003 SsangYong Korando
To start off, 2003 SsangYong Korando is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Citroen DS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Citroen DS would be higher. At 2,874 cc (5 cylinders), 2003 SsangYong Korando is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 SsangYong Korando (118 HP @ 4100 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1962 Citroen DS. (82 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 SsangYong Korando should accelerate faster than 1962 Citroen DS.
Because 2003 SsangYong Korando is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Citroen DS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 SsangYong Korando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Citroen DS | 2003 SsangYong Korando | |
Make | Citroen | SsangYong |
Model | DS | Korando |
Year Released | 1962 | 2003 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1911 cc | 2874 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 82 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 8.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 70 L |