1962 Citroen DS vs. 2005 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2005 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Citroen DS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Citroen DS would be higher. At 1,911 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Citroen DS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volkswagen Polo (128 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1962 Citroen DS. (82 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1962 Citroen DS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Volkswagen Polo weights approximately 34 kg more than 1962 Citroen DS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Citroen DS | 2005 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Citroen | Volkswagen |
Model | DS | Polo |
Year Released | 1962 | 2005 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1911 cc | 1896 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 82 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1314 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2470 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 45 L |