1962 Citroen DS vs. 2006 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2006 Ford Falcon is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Citroen DS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Citroen DS would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Falcon (200 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 1962 Citroen DS. (82 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1962 Citroen DS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Falcon weights approximately 426 kg more than 1962 Citroen DS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Citroen DS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Citroen DS | 2006 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | DS | Falcon |
Year Released | 1962 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1911 cc | 3984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 82 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 9.6:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1155 kg | 1581 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2930 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 70 L |