1962 Citroen DS vs. 2006 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Citroen DS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Citroen DS would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (108 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1962 Citroen DS. (82 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1962 Citroen DS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Ranger weights approximately 560 kg more than 1962 Citroen DS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Citroen DS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Citroen DS | 2006 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | DS | Ranger |
Year Released | 1962 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1911 cc | 2499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 82 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 19.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1155 kg | 1715 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 82 L |