1962 Citroen DS vs. 2008 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2008 Jaguar XF is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Citroen DS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Citroen DS would be higher. At 2,720 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jaguar XF (204 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 1962 Citroen DS. (82 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1962 Citroen DS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jaguar XF weights approximately 451 kg more than 1962 Citroen DS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Jaguar XF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Jaguar XF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Citroen DS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Citroen DS | 2008 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Citroen | Jaguar |
| Model | DS | XF |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1911 cc | 2720 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 82 HP | 204 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1771 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 4970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2920 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 69 L |
