1962 Citroen DS vs. 2009 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2009 Volvo XC90 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Citroen DS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Citroen DS would be higher. At 3,192 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo XC90 (232 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 1962 Citroen DS. (82 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1962 Citroen DS.
Because 2009 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Citroen DS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Citroen DS | 2009 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | DS | XC90 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1911 cc | 3192 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 82 HP | 232 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 70 L |