1962 Citroen DS vs. 2013 GMC Yukon
To start off, 2013 GMC Yukon is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Citroen DS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Citroen DS would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 GMC Yukon (316 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 234 more horse power than 1962 Citroen DS. (82 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 GMC Yukon should accelerate faster than 1962 Citroen DS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 GMC Yukon weights approximately 1253 kg more than 1962 Citroen DS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 GMC Yukon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 GMC Yukon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Citroen DS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Citroen DS | 2013 GMC Yukon | |
| Make | Citroen | GMC |
| Model | DS | Yukon |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1911 cc | 5300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 82 HP | 316 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 2573 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 5649 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 2009 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1950 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 3302 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 119 L |
