1962 Citroen DS vs. 2013 Volvo C30
To start off, 2013 Volvo C30 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Citroen DS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Citroen DS would be higher. At 2,500 cc (5 cylinders), 2013 Volvo C30 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo C30 (224 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 1962 Citroen DS. (82 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo C30 should accelerate faster than 1962 Citroen DS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo C30 weights approximately 302 kg more than 1962 Citroen DS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Citroen DS | 2013 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | DS | C30 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1911 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 5 valves |
Horse Power | 82 HP | 224 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1155 kg | 1457 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4266 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 2039 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1447 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2640 mm |