1962 DAF 600 vs. 1950 Holden FX
To start off, 1962 DAF 600 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,165 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Holden FX (51 HP) has 32 more horse power than 1962 DAF 600. (19 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1950 Holden FX should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Holden FX weights approximately 340 kg more than 1962 DAF 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1950 Holden FX (136 Nm) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF 600. (45 Nm). This means 1950 Holden FX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 DAF 600 | 1950 Holden FX | |
| Make | DAF | Holden |
| Model | 600 | FX |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1950 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 590 cc | 2165 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 19 HP | 51 HP |
| Torque | 45 Nm | 136 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 970 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4380 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1580 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2620 mm |
