1962 DAF 600 vs. 1996 Rover 200
To start off, 1996 Rover 200 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF 600 would be higher. At 1,993 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Rover 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Rover 200 (140 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 1962 DAF 600. (19 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Rover 200 weights approximately 575 kg more than 1962 DAF 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Rover 200 (185 Nm) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF 600. (45 Nm). This means 1996 Rover 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 DAF 600 | 1996 Rover 200 | |
| Make | DAF | Rover |
| Model | 600 | 200 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 590 cc | 1993 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 19 HP | 140 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 45 Nm | 185 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 84.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 65 mm | 89 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1205 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2510 mm |
