1962 DAF 600 vs. 2003 Ford Ka
To start off, 2003 Ford Ka is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF 600 would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Ka (69 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1962 DAF 600. (19 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Ka weights approximately 332 kg more than 1962 DAF 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford Ka (106 Nm) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF 600. (45 Nm). This means 2003 Ford Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF 600.
Compare all specifications:
1962 DAF 600 | 2003 Ford Ka | |
Make | DAF | Ford |
Model | 600 | Ka |
Year Released | 1962 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 590 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 19 HP | 69 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 45 Nm | 106 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 74 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 65 mm | 75.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 962 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 3630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 40 L |