1962 DAF 600 vs. 2003 Mazda Roadster
To start off, 2003 Mazda Roadster is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF 600 would be higher. At 1,838 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda Roadster is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda Roadster (148 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 1962 DAF 600. (19 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda Roadster should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda Roadster weights approximately 450 kg more than 1962 DAF 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda Roadster (167 Nm) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF 600. (45 Nm). This means 2003 Mazda Roadster will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF 600.
Compare all specifications:
1962 DAF 600 | 2003 Mazda Roadster | |
Make | DAF | Mazda |
Model | 600 | Roadster |
Year Released | 1962 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 590 cc | 1838 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 19 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 45 Nm | 167 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 65 mm | 85 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 3960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1240 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2270 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 48 L |