1962 DAF 600 vs. 2004 Daihatsu Naked
To start off, 2004 Daihatsu Naked is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF 600 would be higher. At 658 cc (3 cylinders), 2004 Daihatsu Naked is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Daihatsu Naked (63 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1962 DAF 600. (19 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Daihatsu Naked should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Daihatsu Naked weights approximately 180 kg more than 1962 DAF 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Daihatsu Naked (107 Nm) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF 600. (45 Nm). This means 2004 Daihatsu Naked will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 DAF 600 | 2004 Daihatsu Naked | |
| Make | DAF | Daihatsu |
| Model | 600 | Naked |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 590 cc | 658 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 19 HP | 63 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 45 Nm | 107 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 68 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 65 mm | 60.5 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 810 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 3400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2370 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 37 L |
