1962 DAF 600 vs. 2004 MCC ForFour
To start off, 2004 MCC ForFour is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF 600 would be higher. At 1,124 cc (3 cylinders), 2004 MCC ForFour is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 MCC ForFour (74 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1962 DAF 600. (19 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 MCC ForFour should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 MCC ForFour weights approximately 312 kg more than 1962 DAF 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 MCC ForFour (102 Nm) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF 600. (45 Nm). This means 2004 MCC ForFour will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 DAF 600 | 2004 MCC ForFour | |
| Make | DAF | MCC |
| Model | 600 | ForFour |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 590 cc | 1124 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 19 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 45 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 942 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 3760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1460 mm |
