1962 DAF 600 vs. 2009 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2009 Ford Ranger is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF 600 would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Ranger (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 1962 DAF 600. (19 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford Ranger weights approximately 336 kg more than 1962 DAF 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Ranger (209 Nm) has 164 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF 600. (45 Nm). This means 2009 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF 600.
Compare all specifications:
1962 DAF 600 | 2009 Ford Ranger | |
Make | DAF | Ford |
Model | 600 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1962 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 590 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 19 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 45 Nm | 209 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2840 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 64 L |