1962 DAF 600 vs. 2009 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2009 Jaguar XJ is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF 600 would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jaguar XJ (235 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 216 more horse power than 1962 DAF 600. (19 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 984 kg more than 1962 DAF 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jaguar XJ (293 Nm) has 248 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF 600. (45 Nm). This means 2009 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 DAF 600 | 2009 Jaguar XJ | |
| Make | DAF | Jaguar |
| Model | 600 | XJ |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 590 cc | 2966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 19 HP | 235 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6800 RPM |
| Torque | 45 Nm | 293 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 89 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 65 mm | 79.5 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1614 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 5100 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1870 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 3040 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 85 L |
