1962 DAF 600 vs. 2010 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2010 Toyota Tundra is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF 600 would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Toyota Tundra (234 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 215 more horse power than 1962 DAF 600. (19 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 700 kg more than 1962 DAF 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Toyota Tundra (266 Nm) has 221 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF 600. (45 Nm). This means 2010 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF 600.
Compare all specifications:
1962 DAF 600 | 2010 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | DAF | Toyota |
Model | 600 | Tundra |
Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 590 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 19 HP | 234 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 45 Nm | 266 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1330 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 50 L |