1962 DAF 600 vs. 2012 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2012 Ford Falcon is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF 600 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford Falcon (240 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 221 more horse power than 1962 DAF 600. (19 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford Falcon weights approximately 1018 kg more than 1962 DAF 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford Falcon (353 Nm) has 308 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF 600. (45 Nm). This means 2012 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF 600.
Compare all specifications:
1962 DAF 600 | 2012 Ford Falcon | |
Make | DAF | Ford |
Model | 600 | Falcon |
Year Released | 1962 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 590 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 19 HP | 240 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 45 Nm | 353 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 65 mm | 83.1 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1648 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4967 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1868 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1433 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2838 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 68 L |