1962 DAF 600 vs. 2013 Kia RIO
To start off, 2013 Kia RIO is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF 600 would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Kia RIO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Kia RIO (136 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1962 DAF 600. (19 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Kia RIO should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Kia RIO weights approximately 549 kg more than 1962 DAF 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Kia RIO (167 Nm) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF 600. (45 Nm). This means 2013 Kia RIO will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 DAF 600 | 2013 Kia RIO | |
| Make | DAF | Kia |
| Model | 600 | RIO |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 590 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 19 HP | 136 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Torque | 45 Nm | 167 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 77 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 65 mm | 85 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1179 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4366 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1455 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2570 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 28 L | 43 L |
