1962 DAF 750 vs. 1961 Studebaker Silver Hawk
To start off, 1962 DAF 750 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Studebaker Silver Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Studebaker Silver Hawk would be higher. At 3,050 cc (6 cylinders), 1961 Studebaker Silver Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Studebaker Silver Hawk (100 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1962 DAF 750. (31 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1961 Studebaker Silver Hawk should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Studebaker Silver Hawk weights approximately 688 kg more than 1962 DAF 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 Studebaker Silver Hawk (206 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 149 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF 750. (57 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1961 Studebaker Silver Hawk will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF 750.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 DAF 750 | 1961 Studebaker Silver Hawk | |
| Make | DAF | Studebaker |
| Model | 750 | Silver Hawk |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1961 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 3050 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 31 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 57 Nm | 206 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 85.5 mm | 76.2 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 65 mm | 111 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.1:1 | 7.8:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 662 kg | 1350 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 5190 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 3070 mm |
