1962 DAF 750 vs. 1978 Peugeot 305
To start off, 1978 Peugeot 305 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF 750 would be higher. At 1,290 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Peugeot 305 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Peugeot 305 (64 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1962 DAF 750. (31 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Peugeot 305 should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Peugeot 305 weights approximately 268 kg more than 1962 DAF 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 DAF 750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 DAF 750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Peugeot 305, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1978 Peugeot 305 (96 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF 750. (57 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1978 Peugeot 305 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF 750.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 DAF 750 | 1978 Peugeot 305 | |
| Make | DAF | Peugeot |
| Model | 750 | 305 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 1290 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 31 HP | 64 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 57 Nm | 96 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3750 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 85.5 mm | 78 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 65 mm | 67.6 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.1:1 | 8.8:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 662 kg | 930 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4250 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2630 mm |
