1962 DAF 750 vs. 1994 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 1994 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF 750 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Volkswagen Polo (75 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1962 DAF 750. (31 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF 750.
Because 1962 DAF 750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 DAF 750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Volkswagen Polo (128 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF 750. (57 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1994 Volkswagen Polo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF 750.
Compare all specifications:
1962 DAF 750 | 1994 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | DAF | Volkswagen |
Model | 750 | Polo |
Year Released | 1962 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 31 HP | 75 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 57 Nm | 128 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85.5 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 65 mm | 77.4 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 3720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2410 mm |