1962 DAF 750 vs. 1996 Ford Probe
To start off, 1996 Ford Probe is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF 750 would be higher. At 1,989 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Ford Probe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Probe (118 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1962 DAF 750. (31 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Probe should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Ford Probe weights approximately 558 kg more than 1962 DAF 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 DAF 750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 DAF 750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Ford Probe, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Ford Probe (172 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF 750. (57 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1996 Ford Probe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF 750.
Compare all specifications:
1962 DAF 750 | 1996 Ford Probe | |
Make | DAF | Ford |
Model | 750 | Probe |
Year Released | 1962 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 1989 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 31 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 57 Nm | 172 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85.5 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 65 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.1:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 662 kg | 1220 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2620 mm |