1962 DAF 750 vs. 1996 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1996 Toyota Celica is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF 750 would be higher. At 1,762 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Toyota Celica (114 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1962 DAF 750. (31 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Toyota Celica weights approximately 433 kg more than 1962 DAF 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 DAF 750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 DAF 750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Toyota Celica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Toyota Celica (154 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF 750. (57 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1996 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF 750.
Compare all specifications:
1962 DAF 750 | 1996 Toyota Celica | |
Make | DAF | Toyota |
Model | 750 | Celica |
Year Released | 1962 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 1762 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 31 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 57 Nm | 154 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85.5 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 65 mm | 78 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 662 kg | 1095 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1760 mm |