1962 DAF 750 vs. 1998 Ford Taurus
To start off, 1998 Ford Taurus is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF 750 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Ford Taurus (200 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 169 more horse power than 1962 DAF 750. (31 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF 750.
Because 1962 DAF 750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 DAF 750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Ford Taurus (264 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 207 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF 750. (57 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1998 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF 750.
Compare all specifications:
1962 DAF 750 | 1998 Ford Taurus | |
Make | DAF | Ford |
Model | 750 | Taurus |
Year Released | 1962 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | V |
Horse Power | 31 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 57 Nm | 264 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.1:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |