1962 DAF 750 vs. 2000 Honda Civic
To start off, 2000 Honda Civic is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF 750 would be higher. At 1,396 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Honda Civic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Honda Civic (89 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1962 DAF 750. (31 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Honda Civic should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Honda Civic weights approximately 388 kg more than 1962 DAF 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 DAF 750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 DAF 750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Honda Civic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Honda Civic (139 Nm @ 4300 RPM) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF 750. (57 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2000 Honda Civic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF 750.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 DAF 750 | 2000 Honda Civic | |
| Make | DAF | Honda |
| Model | 750 | Civic |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 1396 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 31 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 57 Nm | 139 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4300 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 85.5 mm | 75.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 65 mm | 79 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.1:1 | 10.8:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 662 kg | 1050 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4470 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2630 mm |
