1962 DAF 750 vs. 2001 Fiat Palio
To start off, 2001 Fiat Palio is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF 750 would be higher. At 1,579 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Fiat Palio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Fiat Palio (102 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1962 DAF 750. (31 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Fiat Palio should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Fiat Palio weights approximately 433 kg more than 1962 DAF 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 DAF 750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 DAF 750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Fiat Palio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Fiat Palio (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF 750. (57 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2001 Fiat Palio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF 750.
Compare all specifications:
1962 DAF 750 | 2001 Fiat Palio | |
Make | DAF | Fiat |
Model | 750 | Palio |
Year Released | 1962 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 1579 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 31 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 57 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85.5 mm | 80.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 65 mm | 78.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.1:1 | 11.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 662 kg | 1095 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2430 mm |