1962 DAF 750 vs. 2001 Ford Taurus
To start off, 2001 Ford Taurus is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF 750 would be higher. At 2,961 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford Taurus (201 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 170 more horse power than 1962 DAF 750. (31 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Taurus weights approximately 843 kg more than 1962 DAF 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 DAF 750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 DAF 750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ford Taurus (250 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 193 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF 750. (57 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2001 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF 750.
Compare all specifications:
1962 DAF 750 | 2001 Ford Taurus | |
Make | DAF | Ford |
Model | 750 | Taurus |
Year Released | 1962 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 2961 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | V |
Horse Power | 31 HP | 201 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 57 Nm | 250 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85.5 mm | 89.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 65 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.1:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 662 kg | 1505 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2760 mm |