1962 DAF 750 vs. 2002 Lancia Zeta
To start off, 2002 Lancia Zeta is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF 750 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Lancia Zeta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Lancia Zeta (134 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 1962 DAF 750. (31 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Lancia Zeta should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Lancia Zeta weights approximately 938 kg more than 1962 DAF 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 DAF 750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 DAF 750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Lancia Zeta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Lancia Zeta (181 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 124 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF 750. (57 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2002 Lancia Zeta will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF 750.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 DAF 750 | 2002 Lancia Zeta | |
| Make | DAF | Lancia |
| Model | 750 | Zeta |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 31 HP | 134 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 57 Nm | 181 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4100 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 85.5 mm | 85 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 65 mm | 88 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.1:1 | 11.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 662 kg | 1600 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2830 mm |
