1962 DAF 750 vs. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF 750 would be higher. At 3,965 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 164 more horse power than 1962 DAF 750. (31 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 1237 kg more than 1962 DAF 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 DAF 750. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 255 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF 750. (57 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF 750.
Compare all specifications:
1962 DAF 750 | 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | DAF | Jeep |
Model | 750 | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1962 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 3965 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 31 HP | 195 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 57 Nm | 312 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85.5 mm | 99 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 65 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.1:1 | 8.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 662 kg | 1899 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2700 mm |