1962 DAF 750 vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF 750 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer (120 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1962 DAF 750. (31 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer weights approximately 544 kg more than 1962 DAF 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 DAF 750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 DAF 750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer (176 Nm) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF 750. (57 Nm). This means 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF 750.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 DAF 750 | 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
| Make | DAF | Mitsubishi |
| Model | 750 | Lancer |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 31 HP | 120 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 57 Nm | 176 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 85.5 mm | 82 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 65 mm | 96 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.1:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 662 kg | 1206 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4590 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2510 mm |
